Sunday 21 June 2009

The life of a globetrotter

1 comments
<< Changing colors..
@masterpiececreations



I'm homeless. If I think about it, the only thing that binds me to Japan is my citizenship and my physical attributes, and my undying appreciation for its food. Even my bloodline is groundless: half-Korean, quarter-Chinese, and quarter-Japanese. It makes me an Asian mutt.

Allegedly I don't even appear Japanese. I remember those days during grade school when I would commute via the train, and I would get curious - that's a euphemism - looks and glances from other Japanese commuters. All in all, my Japanese passport makes me a Japanese citizen. But, a thoroughly western education makes me something else that's not at all Japanese. Sure, I suppose I say that I 'return' to Tokyo, but it's not like I have an actual 'home' - in both the physical and metaphorical sense - to return to, let alone enough family members to ground my already-flimsy attachment. More often than not I feel like I'm more of a visitor than a returnee.

To be sure, many people who leave their hometowns for a while could feel like an alien upon their return. In a world where a few hundred dollars could buy you a return ticket across a couple continents, the reverse cultural shock and the consequent feeling of alienation is probably prevalent now more than ever. But I would argue that the key here is one's level of attachment to that first, so-called 'hometown'. The relationship, it seems, is entirely inverse: the stronger you recognised it as a 'hometown'/'home country' (prior to your departure and probably for a little while afterwards), the less trouble you had reconciling or coming to terms with your groundlessness. And vice versa.

I left Tokyo nearly seven years ago to go to Canada for university. When I finished my undergraduate degree, I moved back to Tokyo, and then a year later moved to England for grad school. Some would say that these decisions were quite the jump, even a courageous thing to do. Thank you - I'll take the compliment and saturate my ego in them for a little while. But really, it wasn't such a big deal at first, because I didn't leave anything all that valuable in Japan, other than my scattered family members. Friends were gone, the apartment in which we lived was gone, my belongings were all gone, my piano was gone. And with it went all the baggage that was attached to them. Leaving Tokyo was like finally cleaning up your room and purging it of all the unnecessary debris. I took all my valuables with me, mostly. Some pictures, but not very much. Some books. Clothes. CD's (it was just before the mp3 era). Money. And of course, that passport that, four years later, dragged me back to 'home', as some people would call it. Except, I don't, of course.

So when I finished university four years later, I felt frustrated by my Japanese passport dragging me back to a place I wasn't attached to. I was fully aware that there was, never was, and never will be in me, the same kind and level of patriotism or loyalty prevalent amongst my Canadian and American peers. In fact, that void was temporarily substituted by a sentimental attachment to Canada. This meant that this time around, I was leaving things that meant something to me. I felt like I was having to start life anew against my will. In four years I had grown some roots in Canada, and although I didn't ever quite feel like I'd adapt to the Canadian work ethic or smoke weed 24/7, Vancouver became the closest city to what an average person may call 'home'. And then, once again, I had to leave it.

So that is how my life goes on: in Japan, in England, and maybe back to Canada again at some point, or some other country, English-speaking or not. Who knows. It's exciting, you say? Sure, life can be exciting when things are changing. But such spontaneity only makes your life exciting when you have a home base to return to, not just to remind you of your roots, but so that you have a reference point. By reference point, I mean a family to return to, that same room whose door you can shut behind you, that same bed you can collapse onto and smell the same scent of clean laundry. When you have all that, a globetrotting life is full of great changes that awaken your senses to a swirling world of excitement. It allows you to appreciate all that is stable and all that is changing.

Recently, I've come to wonder whether this type of life was doing more harm than good. Only a select few would ever understand the structural issues inherent in a globetrotting life. After all, we third culture kids behave and think very differently from those who remained in one city or one country. More importantly, we are different from those exposed to one cultural environment for a prolonged period of time and by proxy, learned early on how to grow roots, and then uproot oneself without tearing the roots apart. For the latter, this life of a globetrotter may seem like a dream beyond a dream. All the travels, all the different people one gets to meet, all the world's wonders at one's feet to explore. But they have no idea what groundlessness does to people. You're always a fleeting kind of existence. Meeting people and saying goodbye. Creating something great and then having to leave it - even if it were a life's work. You almost have to build up a level of impermeable superficiality to deal with it, so that you can maintain somewhat of a core to what you think is who you are. You are at once required to adapt to your surroundings like a chameleon vanishing into its environs. But this oft-unquestioned act of instantaneous adaptation, the habit so carefully developed for survival purposes, also becomes a source of internal agony. Your values are always in question, your personality is always trying to adjust, and your life style is always altering.

Could you really imagine yourself in constant flux? I mean, your entire self!

So the question becomes, do I now opt for a life of geographic stability, and give up the rights and responsibilities of a globetrotter? Do I relinquish the liberties of a groundless wanderer, and place myself within certain bounds? I've never had that kind of life before, and the prospect of it is honestly scary.

Read more!

Saturday 20 June 2009

Nostalgia

0 comments
I want to talk about nostalgia. For people, for places, for times.

At the Isle of Wight Festival last weekend, Judy Collins said that the 1960s were heading back into fashion.

I want to examine what that actually means.

What were the 1960s? I wasn't there.

I can tell you what it wasn't: 'Peace Love Happiness", "Woodstock"
Read more!

Tuesday 16 June 2009

Creative Crunch?

0 comments
Tapping the creative energy >>

When one door closes...you're unemployed for a bit.

If things work out, I will have only 3 days of credit crunch hell. And that is indeed a special kind of hell. Working for nothing at least fends off the bad spirits.

Doing nothing, for nothing, with no certainty of 'nothing' ever becoming 'something' removes the desire to even twiddle one's thumbs.

But I don't want to talk about unemployment, or the credit crunch. I want to talk about creativity, and the way it manifests itself.

Is it a question of confidence? Certainly. Productivity? Yes.

Both are qualities of being employed. Even making tea or surfing the internet mindlessly increases creative output. Why? Because your ego is thrilled to confirm that someone needs you for something. And, more importantly, because they are focused on someone else. You're helping to feed someone else's caffeine addiction, or you're stealing someone else's time, and get that cheeky pride in managing to get away with it.

Creating, however, is the most selfish activity in the world. And for most of us, selfishness takes energy. Hence unemployment is bad for output! It is good for influence and ideas, but not actual production. When left all day thinking only of yourself, it becomes impossible to look inward without feeling a crushing self-hatred for your indolence, your slothfulness, and your inability to contribute anything.

Unless you're a complete narcissist. Which, to be fair, does actually seem true for most 'canon' writers: Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Byron, Shakespeare, Plath, Rand, Dickens, on and on and on This narcissism is then forgiven by re-branding it as 'drawing influence from life.' Lives that end at approximately half the length of the average person...

Read more!

Wednesday 10 June 2009

Thinking - A sin?

0 comments
Peering inside a brain! -DilbertMy latest line of inquiry has been about thinking.

I'm often told that I think too much. As one friend, a hypoglycemic, put it, "Your thought process is faster than my metabolism."

As a direct result of my so-called over-thinking, I pay a lot of attention to a lot of detail. I notice things about people or events, and think about why they did it, why it happened, how they got there and such. So when the lady standing across from me on the bus is fidgeting with her shopping bag, smiling to herself and gazing out the window, I think: "She went to Sainsbury's. She's having a good day. Is she looking at herself? Maybe she lost some weight. Or maybe she's happy that she got all her chores done. Or she's looking forward to a good weekend, perhaps even a trip. I wonder where she's going. Where's she from? She looks eastern European." And off it goes, my brain.

But a moment's thought should reveal to anyone that everything - absolutely everything - originates first in thought. The begging question, therefore, comes down to this: We have brains, so is it a sin to use it?

I'm thinking things when people do or say things that involve me. Compounded by all the thinking I casually do on a daily basis, I've naturally built a sort of databank in my head of all the things people say or do in reaction to something. Hence, I don't simply speculate on explanations when something happens; I have a fairly informed guesstimate, borne out of hours and years of observing, thinking, and remembering.

But really, I make it sound more complicated and extraordinary than it actually is. Most people, in fact probably everyone, does this. Some people just don't actively think that they're doing it - the whole observing, thinking, remembering - whereas I do.

There are consequences, however; just as there are consequences for everything else. Sometimes, if you're not careful, you think so far into the future that you feel either hopeless, lost, confused with life and anxious at the endless possibilities and by proxy, uncertainties. Other times, you think through things so quickly and thoroughly - and no less for those around you - that you get frustrated that such thoughts aren't given to you in return. By reaction, the people around you get nervous that they're going to miss out on something you'd thought of already, and vice versa. And for most people - those of us who aren't such active think-a-holics - it just might get damn annoying that the Thinker is always thinking, and it's like a piece of elastic ready to snap any second.

I don't really like holding to a romanticised notion of the past (like the way way past), but life must've certainly been less jumbled with information, interaction, and matter. Nowadays, there's tonnes of subjects one could ponder about, and we're not left to ever 'not think', other than maybe within the hour or two of yoga classes. And even then, it's hard.

Thinking, though, isn't all bad. I, for one, think it makes me a pretty considerate person. I can think comfortably in advance and plan ahead. Planning ahead, in fact, comes to me like second nature. It's effortless and easy. Thinking also makes me more articulate about things. Because it's almost like you're constantly talking to yourself, you find ways to word things, to express them and make them more descriptive or less sensational, depending on your needs.

And of course, someone who doesn't think wouldn't blog like this!

Read more!